Since v5.5, Scrutiny has a new option on the Settings screen which allows you to tell Scrutiny that urls are in this form. Therefore your pages won't be fully crawled as you expect. But to Scrutiny it looks like a directory (it's not the trailing slash, it's the lack of a file extension) and it will dutifully check all links on that page but only follow (crawl) links which are in the same 'directory' or below. eg You may know that all-publications is a page. If you want to start your crawl at the root, just go ahead, it should be fine and you can limit your crawl if you need to by including or excluding partial urls (blacklisting or whitelisting).Д«ut if you wish to start deep within a site, Scrutiny will limit its crawl to pages within and below that directory. It also applies to other CMS's which generate 'SEO-friendly' urls. This article is for you if you want to scan your Wordpress site for broken links, SEO issues, generate a sitemap, or perform spelling / grammar checks. I guess a less responsible owner wouldn't have the server give this response code, but this seems to me like information I'd really like to know while I'm browsing. What's interesting here is that you can visit a domain and see a page not controlled by the owner of that domain.

(And indeed the page you get at the domain in question here is the kind of thing you'd expect from clicking on an ad). Presumably this is no different from something many of us do - making some space available on the page and allowing Google or another third party to populate it with advertising.

So this means that a third-party is providing the information you see. This may include annotation information about the object, for example. When received in the response to a GET command, this indicates that the returned metainformation is not a definitive set of the object from a server with a copy of the object, but is from a private overlaid web. Scrutiny reports '203 non-authoritative information'.

Snowtape record spotify